• Connect with Facebook
  • Sign up

Don

Cycle Freeway

ajaxloading

Transport/Travel

Support this proposal

Adapt this proposal

15 Sep 2009

A typical five mile journey in London often goes something like this:

- Walk to bus/train (10 minutes);
- Wait for bus (5 to 15 minutes);
- Bus journey to railway or underground station (10 to 20 minutes, depending on traffic);
- Wait for train (3 to 10 minutes);
- Train journey (20 minutes);
- Walk to destination (7 minutes).


Your best journey time is 54 minutes and your worst is 1hour 22 minutes. Imagine how much investment it would take in rail and bus to halve those journey times: twice as many bus routes and stations to reduce the walks at either end, doubling the speed of
buses and trains and doubling service frequencies too!

Now there is a way to do the same journey reliably in less than 25 minutes. How? By building a network of cycle 'freeways' and supporting infrastructure. Anyone who can remember when motorways were built, will know how they transformed long car journeys, which had previously involved hundreds of stops at junctions and a high probability of getting lost. The cycle freeways will do for bikes what the motorways did for cars. The freeways will be as wide, straight and flat as possible, providing clear unimpeded routes through the city. Cyclists will no longer have to choose between risking the congested main roads or finding their way through a maze of back streets.

Journey times for a 5 mile trip will be from 25 minutes at a gentle 12 mph to only 15 minutes at a brisk 20 mph [1]. At the terminus and key points on route, freeway service stations will offer secure, covered cycle parking, cafés, bike shops and shelter in case of heavy rain.

Studies show that a cycle freeway will be able to carry about 8 times the number of people per hour than cars could on a road of the same size. And the energy used per mile travelled will be 50 times less than for cars [2].

In environmental terms, cycle freeways are better than all other forms of land transport. The energy used per passenger mile is shown in the table:

................ Calories ............kJ ................. kWh
=============================
Car .......... 1860 .............. 7780 ............. 2.16
Bus ......... 920 ................ 3850 ............. 1.07
Rail ......... 885 ................ 3700 ............. 1.03
Foot ........ 100 ............... 420 ................ 0.12
Bicycle .... 35 ................. 145 ................. 0.04



For comparison: To boil kettle requires about 0.06kWh for 0.5 litres of water. A typical fridge-freezer uses about 1.5kWh per day.

The freeways will be cheaper to build than any conceivable alternative and offer unparalleled fast, convenient door-door transport. As a trial, suitable routes could be coned-off from motor transport for a summer and the 'service stations' provided as temporary buildings or tents. Once built we would probably wonder how we ever expected cyclists to mix with heavy traffic.

References:
=======
Ref.[1] Bicycle speeds: A human being travelling on a bicycle at low to medium speeds of around 10-15 mph (16-24 km/h), using only the energy required to walk, is the most energy-efficient means of transport generally available. wikipedia - Bicycle Performance.
For comparison, an average speed for the Tour de France is about 25 mph over a course of more than 2000 miles that includes mountainous terrain.

Ref.[2] Carrying capacity of roads used by bicycles: Persons per hour that one meter-width-equivalent right-of-way can carry, by mode:
- Auto in mixed traffic = 170
- Bicycle = 1,500
Source: Modal carrying capacity: United Nations, Transportation Strategies for Human
Settlements in Developing Countries.

Ref.[3] Energy used by bicycles: Calculations of energy per passenger mile depend a lot on assumptions made (a car with just one occupant or a bus with few passengers is less efficient than when full). However bicycles always emerge as by far the most economical. Figures used here for energy per passenger-mile are from: Marcia Lowe, The Bicycle: Vehicle for a Small Planet (Worldwatch Institute, 1989). Equivalent kJ values calculated using: one 'large calorie' or 'kilogram calorie' is about 4.184 kJ. See also: Energy consumption of different modes of transport. (Transport 2000).

Ported from:
========
http://www.openengineering.talktalk.net

Comments

  • An amazing idea! I don't understand why they have not already done it. Cycling in London is the best way to get anywhere but you have to watch out. Pseudo cycle lanes which end half way down a road, getting stuck at badly timed traffic light. I skipped some recently only to be pulled over by the police, sirens and everything. There should be exclusive routes for cyclists etc. Rather than Boris Johnson's half baked plan for a number of cycle wardens to guide people on bikes akin to a tour guide with their umbrella. see below -
    http://conservativehome.blogs.com/localgovernment/2009/08/boris-launches-cycle-fridays.html

    Written by alex on 15 Sep 2009, at 22:53 Report this comment

  • I love this! Bristol could do with implementing an idea like this through the city as well as a connecting cycle highway between Bristol and Bath would also work extremely well. We are launching a projects functionality to the site end of September so that this sort of idea can be brought to life!

    Written by Nicola Gunstone on 16 Sep 2009, at 12:15 Report this comment

  • As a citizen of OFP, I was intrigued to read your analysis of the potential offered by Cycle Freeways.

    Certainly cycling is more planet friendly than driving cars. I rode a bike for many years, however I found it very difficult climbing hills in Bath to my home.

    The other point I would raise, which you say nothing about, is the relationship between pedestrians and cyclists. I once felt I came very close to being injured by a large cyclist moving fast on a narrow but seldom used cycle path.

    I now read that cyclists may receive permission to go the ‘wrong way’ on one-way streets. As a pedestrian who sold his car many years ago for environmental reasons, I do not like the thought that I might be hit ‘from behind’ by a cyclist going the wrong way on a one way street. What are your views on this?

    Karl Jaeger

    Written by Karl Jaeger on 21 Sep 2009, at 12:36 Report this comment

  • Thank you for the comments on my proposal. I absolutely agree that pedestrians also need safe and pleasant paths to walk along. I would hope that the provision of dedicated and separate cycle freeways would reduce the temptation of cyclists to use pavements or ignore traffic rules. Certainly anything that reduces car use is likely to make pedestrians safer.

    For those who travel longer distances or need some assistance getting up hills, perhaps our cycle freeways could be shared with lightweight electrically assisted bikes. These are usually limited to a maximum speed of 15mph. I have put some further info and pictures here:
    www.openengineering.talktalk.net/OeUni_Transport_en.html

    Written by Don on 29 Sep 2009, at 20:46 Report this comment


Add your comments. Create an Profile to add your views.