M&S: deeply uncool; deeply right

Retailer’s commitment to carbon offsetting flies in face of cynics.

Photo credit: Robert Linder. www.rgbstock.com

Let’s face it. Marks & Spencer has rarely been accused of being a slavish follower of fashion. It was always more cavalry twill than catwalk cool.

OK, in recent years, it’s flirted with designer icons, adding the odd dash of Conran to the mix.  It’s even dipped its toes into hip peer-to-peer greenery with the launch of ‘shwopping’ - the flattery-by-imitation take on Futerra’s clothes swap scheme, swishing.

But in one respect, M&S is being gloriously, resolutely and commendably unfashionable. It’s just announced that its UK operations are now carbon neutral – and that this has been achieved in part through offsetting.

Now, offsetting is about as fashionable these days as shoulder pads and a dodgy mullet. According to conventional wisdom, it’s tokenistic, green guilt stuff: a soft option in place of the hard work of cutting emissions at source.

Well, if M&S was just writing the cheques and carrying on as normal, that accusation might carry some weight. Only it’s not - far from it. Its Plan A programme has cut carbon across the board.

But it knows it can’t be completely carbon-free: no business can hope to achieve that, given our present energy economy.

Many companies, faced with this uncomfortable reality, just shrug their (unpadded) shoulders. Why incur extra costs on something which is clearly deeply uncool, thanks to a combination of holier-than-thou criticism from green fundamentalists and some opportunist sniping from climate sceptics? Particularly when there’s precious little pressure from either customers or shareholders to do so?

So much easier to mutter blandishments about ‘investing in innovation rather than offsetting’. Which sounds all very positive and forward looking – until you realise it does absolutely diddly squat to deal with the carbon you’re pumping into the atmosphere right now, each day and every day.

The unfashionable truth is that the only way to take direct responsibility for those emissions is to enable an equivalent amount to be absorbed, or avoid being emitted, elsewhere. In short, to offset.

So kudos to M&S for flying in the face of fickle fashion, and sticking to their guns.

We hear a lot these days about the need for sustainability to be cool. But sometimes it’s better to be right.

SOURCE: Forum for the Future
This article was originally written by Martin Wright and published by Forum for the Future; a non-profit organisation working globally with business and government to create a sustainable future.

Read more articles with reference to Energy, Business and Sustainable Living. Extend your knowledge by visiting the Ideas Globe, or view our Hot Topics to find more key articles to discuss. We welcome all of your thoughts, Actions, Projects and Proposals!

Not a Planetary Citizen yet? Join us and Sign up to Our Future Planet today! Extend your knowledge by visiting the Ideas Globe, or view our Hot Topics to find more key articles